
CONSTRUCTIVISM

Constructivism Example?
Read the example below and see how you interpret it. Hover over the story to see if it is Constructivism!
THE TEXAS HISTORY ROLE PLAY THAT IS NOW BANNED
I vividly recall a Texas History class on slavery in 7th grade. The course was co-facilitated by three teachers, and had followed a textbook based unit detailing the history of slavery in Texas, the treatment of these people, the work required of them, their contribution to the Texas economy, and living conditions. As with most of my classes, I earned high marks for the multiple-choice test that followed. However, what made this information so memorable was the role-playing portion at the end. For 20 minutes, anyone with blue eyes (like me) was forced to be a slave to the other students. The experience was horrible...and effective.
When we returned to the class, the teachers asked the whole class a series of questions. We were asked, "Why did you make the blue-eyed students clean up? Do you think it was right to have the blue-eyed students do what you told them? " The teachers did not respond in a positive or negative way. Some students started arguing about the replies.




This learning example uses a combination of learning theories.
The first portion of the class as described in paragraph one, follows the classic Behaviorism model. There is a reading assignment in a textbook followed by a multiple choice exam. The instructors have clearly defined the correct responses expected to each question. Even the role play exercise that follows is clearly defined in terms of stimulus and response: Brown-eyed participants give orders. Blue-eyed participants follow orders.
Each group followed the directions and shared the same learning activity; however, the blue-eyed group had an emotionally charged experience that gets shared through the teachers' open-ended questions. This happens in Constructivist learning because students interpret the same information differently (McLeod, 2014). This also occurs because the instructors were asking open-ended questions and not assuming the role of "sage on the stage."
As the brown-eyed participants defended themselves by saying they were following directions, the blue-eyed students elevated the conversation to whether slave owners were right because they were operating within the law (ie following directions). These learners were constructing their knowledge actively through questioning (McLeod, 2014).
Through the class arguments, most of the students started making the connection between the role play and actual slavery. The students were learning through interaction with peers (David L., 2016).
Sources
Becoming a Better University Teacher. (n.d.). Retrieved July 14, 2018, from http://www.ucdoer.ie/index.php/Education_Theory/Constructivism_and_Social_Constructivism_in_the_Classroom
Cooper, P. A. (1993). Paradigm Shifts in Designed Instruction: From Behaviorism to Cognitivism to Constructivism. Educational Technology, 33(5), 12-19.
L., David (2016, September 08). Social Development Theory. Retrieved July 21, 2018, from https://www.learning-theories.com/vygotskys-social-learning-theory.html
McLeod, S. (2012). Zone of Proximal Development. Retrieved July 14, 2018, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.html
Mcleod, S. (2014). Vygotsky - Social Development Theory. Retrieved July 14, 2018, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html
Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child (Vol. 5). Psychology Press.